JOIN NOW LOG IN
iVillage GardenWeb iVillage GardenWeb THE INTERNET'S GARDEN & HOME COMMUNITY ADVERTISEMENT
Blogs Forums Photo Galleries Ask The Experts Tools & Directories        
   

Clippings by rochelles

 Sort by: Last Updated Post Date  Post Title Forum Name 

RE: 4 inch Bottom Drain Needed ASAP (Follow-Up #6)

posted by: ccoombs1 on 06.25.2008 at 03:02 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

poppa, I remember seeing just such a video somewhere....I'll find it for you. As the bubbles rise, they pull water with it....LOTS of water. In fact, the action of rising bubbles to move water has been used for many years in the aquaculture industry. Do a google on "air lifts". You can actually return water to your pond using no water pump at all, only air. I am hoping to employ just such a method on my next pond. It is MUCH more efficient. Anyway.....back to the aerated drains. Yes...as the air bubbles rise, lots of water is pulled up with them. As that water is pulled from the bottom of the pond right over the drain, more water is pulled to that area from along the bottom of the pond, sweeping debris along with it. A waterfall injects air into the pond where it fallsm but usually only 6" to 8" deep. Air from the bottom of the pond aerates the pond SO much better.

OK...I'm off to find that video. Back later on......

Cindy

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.14.2009 at 03:17 am    last updated on: 07.14.2009 at 03:17 am

RE: aerator is too much (Follow-Up #3)

posted by: ccoombs1 on 10.05.2007 at 07:58 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Put a tee in the line and 2 valves. One valve can serve as an exaust...basically diverting the excess flow into the air. Adjust the valve that goes to nothing until you get the air flow in the pond how you want it. You don't want to restrict the entire flow coming out of the pump because back-pressure on the pump will damage it.

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.19.2008 at 08:20 pm    last updated on: 07.19.2008 at 08:20 pm

RE: aerator is too much (Follow-Up #6)

posted by: robinchapelhill on 10.08.2007 at 08:29 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

thank you guys,

I went to Lowes and got a T and clamps and a valve and screw-in device that fits the valve into the assembly. It works great - except it is rather loud. But I have to tell you - that it is apparent that the fish are much energized by this. And it's just great to watch them !

The pond is clearer and they are swimming with enthusiasm.

The new concern... is that we still have 90+ weather here. And there was activity a few days ago - when the temp. reached over mid-90s - of spawning.

In NC - it is possible to go really cold. Tho' this global warming - long-time local drought thing - is making me wonder what I should do for winterizing.

Also - I guess I should post a new message about this - but I have read that koi (i just have two small ones) - don't tolerate temps - below 50F. Is that true ?

Anyway - thanks very much for your help with the aerator
exuberance. The fish seem very happy ! And that makes me really happy !!

R in Chapel Hill

NOTES:

how loud is 'loud'
clipped on: 07.19.2008 at 06:57 pm    last updated on: 07.19.2008 at 06:59 pm

RE: aerator is too much (Follow-Up #9)

posted by: rhodyman on 10.10.2007 at 04:10 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

I have an AP-40 and two bubblers and one valve to balance the flow to the aerators.

You only need a T and one valve. Install the T near the pump. Run one side to the pond. Run the other side to the valve. Open the valve just enough to bleed off the air you don't need in the pond. This is reducing the pressure at the pump and saving the pump. If you put the valve in line with the pump you are increasing the pressure and shortening the life of the pump. A suitable parts are:

www.aquaticeco.com

107A Tee (Insert x Insert x Insert), 5/8" $2.31

70012 Hose Valve, 1/2" $10.89

And some 3/4" Stainless Steel Tubing Clamps.

Here is a link that might be useful: AquaticEco

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.19.2008 at 08:21 pm    last updated on: 07.19.2008 at 08:21 pm

RE: air pumps and stones for winter (Follow-Up #5)

posted by: cliff_and_joann on 12.07.2008 at 08:24 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

jscope...There was a thread about this in November.

the link is below.

Here is a link that might be useful: air stones in winter

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 03.26.2009 at 02:42 pm    last updated on: 03.26.2009 at 02:43 pm

RE: Ammonia Spike (Follow-Up #25)

posted by: drh1 on 05.31.2008 at 11:23 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

A couple of comments that might help: a.) It is possible to strip ammonia out of solution using a bubbler. The more air you add, the finer the bubble size, the faster you can strip it out. To be effective (for ammonia stripping) the pH must be above 7 and preferably higher (8 or even 8.5). The downside is that this also coverts the ammonia from ammonia ion to ammonium hydroxide as you cross the point where the pH equals the equilibrium constant (don't worry about what it is! :-) ). So plopping in a bubbler won't hurt your fish and may actually help a bit with getting the ammonia down. b.) It sounds as if your biofilter is not up to the task of keeping up with the rate of ammonia production. You may, for protection in the future, want to consider expanding/adding on to your biofilter capacity. c.) Your tap water (you indicated it is from a municipal source) should NOT have ammonia in it. If they are attempting to create chloramines in the water they often will add ammonia to the water in the presence of "free chlorine" to create chloramines. If no "free chlorine" is present then you'll only be adding ammonia. The presence of nitrifiers in your drinking water line will actually degrade chloramines with the possibility of creating nitrites and ammonia (this is a headache for most municipalities trying to maintain chloramine residuals - see reference below). I'm not sure if this is directly applicable to your problem. d.) You can add more ChlorAm-X than just the stoichiometric amount to lock up additional amounts of ammonia to be released. I have not seen any published values for upper toxicity limits but a factor of 2x probably would be reasonable without major consequences. A biological control alternative is the introduction of something such as water hyacinths or water lettuce. The root mass offers, as a rule of thumb, 10x the surface area of the amount of plant occupying the surface, i.e. 10 square feet of hyacinth floating on the surface will have at least 100 square feet of root-mass-surface area in the water. The roots not only absorb nutrients but provide the surface area for nitrifiers to grow and help convert the ammonia. Maybe you've already got your pond loaded with these plants. e.) If possible check your dissolved oxygen levels in your pond as well as the temperature. As you know at warmer temperatures oxygen solubility decreases. Part of your fish behavior might be a coincidental side effect that you have low D.O. levels hence they hang out near the water fall. Furthermore, nitrifying bacteria require oxygen-rich environments to convert ammonia. Too low an oxygen level, no conversion (check to see if your biofilter is clean,i.e., not too much gunk in it and also check the D.O. levels going into and coming out of it to make sure adequate D.O. is present). Using a bubbler will help you if you've got a problem. However, if you're within 95% of saturation for D.O. - for your water temperature - then don't bother with additional aeration since you'll be just throwing $$ into the water with no significant impact except that it will help with stripping out the ammonia as I indicated in (a)above. Hope all this helps. Good luck.
---David

Here is a link that might be useful: Nitrifying bacteria and chloramine - example paper

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.20.2008 at 12:37 am    last updated on: 07.20.2008 at 12:37 am

RE: Amorphopallus konjac blooming size odds (Follow-Up #3)

posted by: ironious on 01.20.2009 at 06:46 pm in Aroid Forum

okay Id say
3 inches: 10%
4 inches: 20-40%
5 inches: 70-90%
6 inches: 95-100%
7 inches plus 99-100%
Rough guess.
My tuber is 8 inches. I achieved this by growing in in my greenhouse with high humidity, NEVER letting the soil dry, high phosphate fertilizer and a treatment with Indole Acetic Acid plant growth hormone. My plant was about the size of a softball when I got it and weighed about two lbs. Now it weighs in at over 7lbs.
Its a beautiful thing :-)

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

NOTES:

'voodoo' tuber info, growth hormone
clipped on: 04.02.2009 at 07:33 pm    last updated on: 04.02.2009 at 07:34 pm

RE: Any ideas for hiding exposed liner on side of pond? (Follow-Up #6)

posted by: squirelette on 06.26.2009 at 11:28 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Hi,
I took nylon screen and gooped on a good layer of silicone and put a layer of gravel then let it set. The silicone holds the gravel in place fairly well and it is pretty flexible. This is the first time I tried it so I do not know how long it will last but it worked for covering the edges of the plastic spillway I use and the birds can't dislodge the stones. You could anchor the netting above and let the rocked part hang into the pond over the edge. It only works for peagravel anything bigger is too heavy.

NOTES:

good idea for hiding pond liner
clipped on: 06.29.2009 at 07:15 pm    last updated on: 06.29.2009 at 07:16 pm

RE: bottom drains need advice on how to (Follow-Up #4)

posted by: jdedsk on 04.06.2009 at 07:23 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Just to give you another idea. I put in a 4500 gallon pond and wanted a bottom drain. I have always been afraid of leaks so in my last two ponds I just went with a bottom filter. Too much work and to hard to clean! This pond I went with a 2 inch bottom drain but instead of cutting the liner I placed a 2" pipe with a cage on the end into the deep end(many companies sell the cages). I have attached a black wire so I can pull the drain to the top for easy cleaning. It has been working great for 2 years. If you want more data on my system just let me know. Hope this helps.
David

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.14.2009 at 11:13 am    last updated on: 07.14.2009 at 11:13 am

RE: Can anyone tell me how to take care of this beautiful orchid? (Follow-Up #4)

posted by: jemsta on 01.17.2008 at 01:10 pm in Orchids Forum

Susanka,

From the looks of your orchid you aren't doing too shabby :) Most people here will admit to having killed their first orchid very quickly, so getting yours to bloom is an achievement.

It's leaves are a little too dark green so I would give it a little more light, but not too much as that may burn it. Slowly (over the course of a few weeks) move it over to a brighter spot and monitor to make sure that leaves aren't getting warm to the touch.

Since the orchid has been in the same pot for the 5 years is is certainly due for a repot. Here is a website that describes how to repot. You should be able to get a new orchid mix from your local Home Depot or Lowes store. They usually have an "Orchid Mix" or "Phalaenopsis Mix" consisting of Bark, Charcoal and Perlite. Either one of these mixes would work. If you say that you've been overwatering, it's possible that all the roots inside the pot have rotted away, in which case when you repot you should tuck the aerial roots into the medium. Don't move to a larger pot unless there are lots of roots in the medium, orchids generally like to be a little underpotted (you want to fit the roots not the plant).

As to fertilizer, most HD and Lowes stores have an Orchid fertilizer. However any balanced fertilizer around 10-10-10 will do. Make sure you do not over fertilize as orchids can only take in minute amounts of nutrients. Many people fertilize with 1/2 or 1/4 the recommended dose with every watering, aka "fertilizing weakly weekly". Once you start fertilizing you want to make sure to flush the pot at least monthly with clean water from the faucet to make sure that there is no salt buildup.

I know that this is a lot of information, and you certainly have more questions, so I'm also going to refer you to our FAQ. However, please don't hesitate to ask further questions if they're still not answered.

Also, many people here will recommend that you buy a beginner book on orchids such as Ortho's Orchids. These are also usually available at HD and Lowes as well as Amazon, etc.

I hope I've helped and welcome to the forum!
Best,
Jem

NOTES:

101 info
clipped on: 03.25.2009 at 07:13 pm    last updated on: 03.25.2009 at 07:14 pm

RE: Can I install a biofilter? (Follow-Up #6)

posted by: newbirdman on 03.27.2008 at 10:16 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Since I agree with the other people let me tell you something else . I dont know how much money you paid for your Pondomatic vac but i suggest you cancel the order and buy a large wet / dry vac at Sears or a similar place. I have a 3000 gallon pond and I just used it to clean out my pond . It will take you a few days as its better to let the dirt settle down in the vac before dumping the clean water back in but it really works great . Also at this time of the year , everyones water is clear . As soon as the weather warms then the bacteria and algae will start clouding up your water .
P. S. , only use the vac for your pond , not for cleaning dirt so you dont comtaminant the fish . Rick

NOTES:

oh dear, I used my vac for funky water, follow up on this!
clipped on: 03.26.2009 at 03:37 pm    last updated on: 03.26.2009 at 03:38 pm

RE: concrete in living pond (Follow-Up #6)

posted by: sleeplessinftwayne on 06.19.2008 at 03:42 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

I'm back again. These two books by Sherri Warner Hunter are probably the best books on using and making concrete projects I have ever read. I haven't been looking for others for a while but I can't imagine any one else coming close to the quality of these books. I got the first one at the library before buying both of them. If you do a lot of artist projects you really should get them for your own use. The first one had a name change so if you are buying second hand you should be aware of that.
The first book is Making Concrete Garden Ornaments and the second is Creative Concrete Ornaments for the Garden: making pots, planters, bird baths, sculpture & more. Both are by Sherri Warner Hunter and can be found at Amazon.com. The cost is well worth it. I have been able to make my own designs as well as some of the ones in the books because the details of the materials and what they do are well explained. Sandy

Here is a link that might be useful: Concrete art. books

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.28.2008 at 10:57 am    last updated on: 07.28.2008 at 10:57 am

RE: Confused about Filters (Follow-Up #3)

posted by: horton on 07.24.2008 at 07:51 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Below is a link to an article about filter types and how they work.
As previously stated pond filters should be cleaned out every so often to keep them healthy.
How often?
That depends the size of the filter to pond ratio, and on the amount of work it is doing.
Consideration should be given to the fish load, plant life cycle, etc, in the pond.

Never clean off all of the filter material at one time.
Always leave some of the filter material "dirty".
This will re inoculate/re-seed the rest of the cleaned material, with the "good bacteria" which is required, to keep the pond water healthy.
"Horton".

Here is a link that might be useful: Pond Filters,

NOTES:

good link
clipped on: 03.26.2009 at 03:53 pm    last updated on: 03.26.2009 at 03:53 pm

RE: container gardening question (Follow-Up #5)

posted by: tedln on 06.08.2009 at 11:40 am in Growing Tomatoes Forum

sirdanny,

I did container gardening for many years and always had success with my method. I don't recommend it, but it worked for me.

I always used fifteen gallon plastic containers with a drain hole in the bottom. In the bottom of the pot, I would place two inches of 50/50 mixed pea gravel and washed river rock. Over the rock layer, I would place one layer of the permeable black landscape cloth. I would then mix 70% soil or dirt with 30% peat moss. I would add one small coffee can of crushed limestone and a good handful of commercial 10-10-10 fertilizer. I would mix all of it in a wheel barrow and fill the tub almost to the top with the mixture. I would then place each tub on some small tiles which were sitting on one of those large round landscape stones. Sitting the pots on the tiles facilitated air circulation under the pot keeping the soil at the bottom of the pot from turning sour. I would then prepare some tomato cages by bending the tips of the legs up to prevent the sharp ends from poking through the bottom of the pots. I would then push the legs through the soil into the rock to the bottom of the pot. I would then drill holes through the top edge of the pots at four locations. I would use good wire and wire the cages in a standing position to the edge of the pots. I would normally use a large washer on the pot end of the wire to prevent the wire from pulling back through the holes. I would then take a second tomato cage and turn it upside down and wire it's large round hoop to the large round hoop of the first cage. This method would result in a tomato cage about 8' tall. I usually allowed the whole thing to sit for about a week with the drip irrigation going. This allowed time for the fertilizer, acid from the meat moss, minerals from the limestone, and micro nutriens and bacteria from the dirt to balance out. I would then plant each pot with three or four tomato plants and three or four cucumber plants.

This method prevented me from purchasing a lot of very expensive potting soil/mix, and performed very well.

Ted

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 06.09.2009 at 10:11 am    last updated on: 06.09.2009 at 10:12 am

Container soils and water in containers (long post)

posted by: tapla on 03.19.2005 at 03:57 pm in Container Gardening Forum

The following is very long & will be too boring for some to wade through. Two years ago, some of my posts got people curious & they started to e-mail me about soil problems. The "Water Movement" article is an answer I gave in an e-mail. I saved it and adapted it for my bonsai club newsletter & it was subsequently picked up & used by a number of other clubs. I now give talks on container soils and the physics of water movement in containers to area clubs.

I think, as container gardeners, our first priority is to insure aeration for the life of the soil. Since aeration and drainage are inversely linked to soil particle size, it makes good sense to try to find a soil component with particles larger than peat and that will retain its structure for extended periods. Pine bark fits the bill nicely.

The following hits pretty hard against the futility of using a drainage layer in an attempt to improve drainage. It just doesn't work. All it does is reduce the soil available for root colonization. A wick will remove the saturated layer of soil. It works in reverse of the self-watering pots widely being discussed on this forum now. I have no experience with these growing containers, but understand the principle well.

There are potential problems with wick watering that can be alleviated with certain steps. Watch for yellowing leaves with these pots. If they begin to occur, you need to flush the soil well. It is the first sign of chloride damage.

One of the reasons I posted this is because of the number of soil questions I'm getting in my mail. It will be a convenient source for me to link to. I will soon be in the middle of repotting season & my time here will be reduced, unfortunately, for me. I really enjoy all the friends I've made on these forums. ;o)

Since there are many questions about soils appropriate for containers, I'll post by basic mix in case any would like to try it. It will follow the Water Movement info.

Water Movement in Soils

Consider this if you will:

Soil need fill only a few needs in plant culture. Anchorage - A place for roots to extend, securing the plant and preventing it from toppling. Nutrient Sink - It must retain sufficient nutrients to sustain plant systems. Gas Exchange - It must be sufficiently porous to allow air to the root system. And finally, Water - It must retain water enough in liquid and/or vapor form to sustain plants between waterings. Most plants could be grown without soil as long as we can provide air, nutrients, and water, (witness hydroponics). Here, I will concentrate primarily on the movement of water in soil(s).

There are two forces that cause water movement through soil - one is gravity, the other capillary action. Gravity needs little explanation, but for this writing I would like to note: Gravitational flow potential (GFP) is greater for water at the top of the pot than it is for water at the bottom of the pot. I'll return to that later. Capillarity is a function of the natural forces of adhesion and cohesion. Adhesion is water's tendency to stick to solid objects like soil particles and the sides of the pot. Cohesion is the tendency for water to stick to itself. Cohesion is why we often find water in droplet form - because cohesion is at times stronger than adhesion, water’s bond to itself can be stronger than the bond to the object it might be in contact with; in this condition it forms a drop. Capillary action is in evidence when we dip a paper towel in water. The water will soak into the towel and rise several inches above the surface of the water. It will not drain back into the source. It will stop rising when the GFP equals the capillary attraction of the fibers in the paper.

There is, in every pot, what is called a "perched water table" (PWT). This is water that occupies a layer of soil that is always saturated & will not drain at the bottom of the pot. It can evaporate or be used by the plant, but physical forces will not allow it to drain. It is there because the capillary pull of the soil at some point will equal the GFP; therefore, the water does not drain, it is "perched". If we fill five cylinders of varying heights and diameters with the same soil mix and provide each cylinder with a drainage hole, the PWT will be exactly the same height in each container. This is the area of the pot where roots seldom penetrate & where root problems begin due to a lack of aeration. From this we can draw the conclusion that: Tall growing containers are a superior choice over squat containers when using the same soil mix. The reason: The level of the PWT will be the same in each container, with the taller container providing more usable, air holding soil above the PWT. Physiology dictates that plants must be able to take in air at the roots in order to complete transpiration and photosynthesis.

A given volume of large soil particles have less overall surface area in comparison to the same volume of small particles and therefore less overall adhesive attraction to water. So, in soils with large particles, GFP more readily overcomes capillary attraction. They drain better. We all know this, but the reason, often unclear, is that the PWT is lower in coarse soils than in fine soils. The key to good drainage is size and uniformity of soil particles. Large particles mixed with small particles will not improve drainage because the smaller particles fit between the large, increasing surface area which increases the capillary attraction and thus the water holding potential. Water and air cannot occupy the same space at the same time. Contrary to what some hold to be true, sand does not improve drainage. Pumice (aka lava rock), or one of the hi-fired clay products like Turface are good additives which help promote drainage and porosity because of their irregular shape.

Now to the main point: When we use a coarse drainage layer under our soil, it does not improve drainage. It does conserve on the volume of soil required to fill a pot and it makes the pot lighter. When we employ this exercise in an attempt to improve drainage, what we are actually doing is moving the level of the PWT higher in the pot. This reduces available soil for roots to colonize, reduces total usable pot space, and limits potential for beneficial gas exchange. Containers with uniform soil particle size from top of container to bottom will yield better drainage and have a lower PWT than containers with drainage layers. The coarser the drainage layer, the more detrimental to drainage it is because water is more (for lack of a better scientific word) reluctant to make the downward transition because the capillary pull of the soil above the drainage layer is stronger than the GFP. The reason for this is there is far more surface area in the soil for water to be attracted to than there is in the drainage layer.

I know this goes against what most have thought to be true, but the principle is scientifically sound, and experiments have shown it as so. Many nurserymen are now employing the pot-in-pot or the pot-in-trench method of growing to capitalize on the science.

If you discover you need to increase drainage, insert a wick into the pot & allow it to extend from the PWT to several inches below the bottom of the pot. This will successfully eliminate the PWT & give your plants much more soil to grow in as well as allow more, much needed air to the roots.

Uniform size particles of fir, hemlock or pine bark are excellent as the primary component of your soils. The lignin contained in bark keeps it rigid and the rigidity provides air-holding pockets in the root zone far longer than peat or compost mixes that rapidly break down to a soup-like consistency. Bark also contains suberin, a lipid sometimes referred to as nature’s preservative. Suberin is what slows the decomposition of bark-based soils. It contains highly varied hydrocarbon chains and the microorganisms that turn peat to soup have great difficulty cleaving these chains.

In simple terms: Plants that expire because of drainage problems either die of thirst because the roots have rotted and can no longer take up water, or they starve to death because they cannot obtain sufficient air at the root zone for the respiratory or photosynthetic processes.

To confirm the existence of the PWT and the effectiveness of using a wick to remove it, try this experiment: Fill a soft drink cup nearly full of garden soil. Add enough water to fill to the top, being sure all soil is saturated. Punch a drain hole in the bottom of the cup & allow to drain. When the drainage stops, insert a wick several inches up into the drain hole . Take note of how much additional water drains. This is water that occupied the PWT before being drained by the wick. A greatly simplified explanation of what occurs is: The wick "fools" the water into thinking the pot is deeper, so water begins to move downward seeking the "new" bottom of the pot, pulling the rest of the PWT along with it.

Having applied these principles in the culture of my containerized plants, both indoors and out, for many years, the methodology I have adopted has shown to be effective and of great benefit to them. I use many amendments when building my soils, but the basic building process starts with screened bark and perlite. Peat usually plays a very minor role in my container soils because it breaks down rapidly and when it does, it impedes drainage.

My Soil

I'll give two recipes. I usually make big batches.

3 parts pine bark fines
1 part sphagnum peat (not reed or sedge peat)
1-2 parts perlite
garden lime
controlled release fertilizer
micro-nutrient powder (substitute: small amount of good, composted manure

Big batch:

3 cu ft pine bark fines (1 big bag)
5 gallons peat
5 gallons perlite
1 cup lime (you can add more to small portion if needed)
2 cups CRF
1/2 cup micro-nutrient powder or 1 gal composted manure

Small batch:

3 gallons pine bark
1/2 gallon peat
1/2 gallon perlite
handful lime (careful)
1/4 cup CRF
1 tsp micro-nutrient powder or a dash of manure ;o)

I have seen advice that some highly organic soils are productive for up to 5 years. I disagree. Even if you were to substitute fir bark for pine bark in this recipe (and this recipe will far outlast any peat based soil) you should only expect a maximum of three years life before a repot is in order. Usually perennials, including trees (they're perennials too, you know ;o)) should be repotted more frequently to insure vigor closer to genetic potential. If a soil is desired that will retain structure for long periods, we need to look to inorganic amendments. Some examples are crushed granite, pea stone, coarse sand (no smaller than BB size in containers, please), Haydite, lava rock, Turface or Schultz soil conditioner.

I hope this starts a good exchange of ideas & opinions so we all can learn.

Al

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 03.25.2009 at 06:55 pm    last updated on: 03.25.2009 at 06:56 pm

dead fathead minnows

posted by: lynneny on 04.21.2008 at 07:11 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

We have a pond that is about 3,000 gallons that my husband started building last summer. He's had problems with the waterfall leaking, and thought he fixed it last week.

I got a pound of free fathead minnows from the county health department about 2 weeks ago. Everything was fine with them, saw them swimming around, until my husband turned on the pump and skimmer in the pond last Thursday. At first there were only a couple of dead fish every other day or so, but today, when he turned off the pumps again to find out where the leak was coming from once more, there were 18 dead fish!!! And they all had their stomach missing!!!

We took some out of the pond to be able to post pictures -
Someone... PLEASE tell me what is doing this???

Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket

NOTES:

So, what did they end up using as a prefilter?
clipped on: 03.26.2009 at 04:24 pm    last updated on: 03.26.2009 at 04:24 pm

Earl’s Hole Method of Growing Tomatoes

posted by: earl on 01.15.2007 at 03:02 pm in Growing Tomatoes Forum

Earl’s Hole Method of Growing Tomatoes

Items from Walmart type garden center, 40 lb. bags of Composted Peat Humus, 40 lb. bags of Composted Cow Manure, Epson Salt and Bonemeal and Espoma Tomato-tone® 4-7-10 fertilizer or equivalent .

In raised beds, after tilling, I dig good sized holes about 2 feet across, scattering the soil around the hole. Then to each hole I add ½ bag of the peat humus, 1/4 bag of the manure, then I scatter about the hole a handful each of Epson salts, Bonemeal and Espoma. Then I use a spade fork to mix the formula VERY well some inches beyond the depth and width of the original hole. If plants are indeterminate they should be planted at least 4 feet apart.

I then, using my hands, I make a hole in the center of this mixture and plant the seedlings. If seedlings are tall I strip off the leaves except for the top few inches, and lay it at an angle or on its side in the hole and cover up to the leaves. Then I form a 4 inch deep water holding basin [a crater] about 1 1/2 feet across and around the plant, then mulch the plants and bed with straw or grass clippings, then water. Last I spread a handful of granular fertilizer such as Espoma Tomato-tone® 4-7-10 on top of the mulch around the plants so it will leach into soil over time and feed the outer roots for they grow wide and deep. I use concrete wire cages 18-20 inches across and anchor them with rebar driven deep next to the cage. When I have to water, if I don’t get rain in 7-10 days, I stick an open ended hose at the base of the plants and give them a couple gallons.

Never over water. The plant’s leaves will tell you they’re thirsty by drooping a bit. As the plants grow, to help prevent leaf disease, trim any branches that droop and touch the mulch.

During late summer if I think they need it I'll give each plant a couple gallons of fish emulsion or what ever liquid type I have. And if you have leaf problems, get started early using Daconil as soon as you plant, even saturate the mulch around the base as well as top and bottom of leaves.

I can't say this is the best way to do it, but it works for me.

Earl

NOTES:

good thread
clipped on: 07.21.2008 at 10:47 pm    last updated on: 07.21.2008 at 10:48 pm

RE: FYI - Electricity cost to run my pond... (Follow-Up #3)

posted by: sheepco on 07.24.2009 at 08:37 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Sorry. My local summer rate is 12.1 cents/kwh (got carried away with the decimal point). But my pond used 3.566kw in 24 hours (so 106.98kw/month). Divide 3.566 by 24, multipy by 720 (total hours in a month) and multiply by .121 =$12.94. (Thats the calculation REA gave me)
My summer electric bill has never been $129 even using the AC!

NOTES:

how to figure monthly elec costs on pond
clipped on: 07.26.2009 at 12:30 am    last updated on: 07.26.2009 at 12:33 am

RE: Have to possibly do huge water change of 2,000 gallons. Help (Follow-Up #5)

posted by: horton on 04.27.2009 at 04:19 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

J, it seems you have a lot going on in your pond, with fish with tatter fins, koi with bumps/lumps, lost fish etc.

Parasite treatments can be very expensive. The larger the volume of water, the more treatment product it is going to take.
I use Interpet Parasite treatment, see it here,
[http://pondusa.com/treat1.htm]
in the Fall as a prophylactic treatment to combat any winter/spring invaders in the pond. It costs about $20.00 to treat 2000 US gallons, a bit more than that in Canada unfortunately!!!

Good suggestion about checking the water parameters, i.e. nitrites, nitrogen, ammonia, pH, etc.

Was your pond cleaned out last Fall or did you leave it full of leaves and other junk, that could be creating a problem now?

Depending on what you find out, re,the fish and water condition, you may have to empty the whole pond and scrub down the sides, vacuum the silt etc, from off the bottom and start all over again, treating the new water with de-chlorinator.
Check the link out below about parasites.

Here is a link that might be useful: Parasites in the pond.

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 04.27.2009 at 04:58 pm    last updated on: 04.27.2009 at 05:18 pm

RE: HELP! (finding scrubbies for skippy filter) (Follow-Up #14)

posted by: pashta_2006 on 05.19.2008 at 06:35 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Here are two different instructions for making your own pot scrubbers. I checked at JoAnns this weekend and the nylon tulle is 99 cents a yard and 45" to 54" wide, so you can get quite a few scrubbies out of 4 yards of tulle and you can make them any size you want.

Crocheted:
I usually buy a couple of yards of net (tulle) and cut in 2 inch strips across the 60 or 72" width of net. Then sew them end to end, and you don't have to be too particular. Then with at least a K hook chain 5 or 6, connect the ends. Then just start sc in every spot you can around continuously until it's about 4 inches across. I try to make the crocheted area as solid as I can, but the design is not important, if there's a gap, I put a sc in it. That's all there is to it. I have made them double layered, too

Sewed (per Heloise):
Here's what you'll need to make one nylon-net scrubber:

1/2 yard of 72-inch-wide nylon net AKA Tulle (found at fabric shops)

scissors

strong nylon thread or dental floss

large needle

1. Cut the nylon net into three 6-inch-by-72-inch strips.

2. Place the three strips on top of each other evenly, then take the needle threaded with nylon thread or dental floss and begin sewing down the middle (lengthwise), using long basting stitches.

3. When done, hold the thread in one hand and pull back on the nylon net to form a ball.

4. Secure the ball by wrapping the ends of the thread around its center and knotting tightly. Trim off the thread ends.

5. Pull apart the layers of nylon net to fluff, and you now have a scrubbie!

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.05.2009 at 10:47 pm    last updated on: 07.05.2009 at 10:48 pm

RE: KH low.. what does this mean? (Follow-Up #1)

posted by: drh1 on 06.06.2009 at 03:45 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Judy, KH is a measure of the alkalinity or buffering capacity of your pond water. The higher the value the better the pond is able to resist swings in pH. It is sometimes called "carbonate hardness" but actually has nothing to do with hardness - that's just terminology left over from water treatment plants. You should have your alkalinity (KH) in the vicinity of 80 mg/l and preferably a bit higher to help your pond avoid what is typically termed a "pH crash" which can easily result in killing your fish. Fortunately it is a very easy thing to adjust. Go to your grocery store or big box store (Costco, etc.) and buy a very large bag of baking soda - NOT baking powder. For your size pond you are going to want to add approximately 2 to 3 pounds of baking soda. The nice thing about all this is that if you add too much not to worry...no impact on your fish or your plants (unless you suddenly dumped in 20 pounds!!! LOL). Given that your pH is already sitting very close to 8.3 you don't need to worry about adding it and having much of an impact on anything. Below is a URL connection to a chemical addition calculator/spreadsheet in Excel, which on the third tab on the bottom of the spreadsheet will allow you to see the impact of what happens when you add sodium bicarbonate. Just enter your pond volume in gallons and play around with the amount of sod. bicarb you might add...you'll then see the impact on your alkalinity. If you are at all concerned about all of this then add say a half pound or so or a couple of cups around the pond, give it a few hours to dissolve and mix and then check your KH. Once you get the KH up there where it needs to be you'll find that it should remain stable for several weeks at a time. Good luck and enjoy the pond!
---David

Here is a link that might be useful: clicking on this will begin the download for the Excel file

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 06.07.2009 at 02:37 am    last updated on: 06.07.2009 at 02:37 am

RE: new pond and plants winter (Follow-Up #2)

posted by: rexanne on 09.21.2007 at 02:42 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

howdy Rick,
I was thinking about growing my plants soilless, I refer you to the links below

http://www.ponddoc.com/WhatsUpDoc/Plants/Soiless.html
http://bonniesplants.com/how_to/soiless_planting.html

(Why do you want to grow them bareroot ?)
to keep dirt out of the pond and to avoid problems of soil going anarobic

(Once they start to reproduce it will be so hard to separate the extra plants from the rocks.)
Even if the rocks are big? egg size or larger?

(Once the plants start growing their roots will cover the top of the pots so the fish cant remove the dirt.)
I have dirt now in the pond because of them tipping over haven't even though about goldies removing dirt, so far they don't even seem interested.

(Whatever you decide , do it now in the fall so you dont disturb the roots in the spring.)
I don't have a lot of neutrients in the water now so I was thinking I should wait till the spring and let the plants use the soil now, undecided as to what's best.

(Make sure you get larger pots . I raise pond plants so what I do is use the cheap black plastic pots you buy them in , put a layer of plastic over the holes on the bottom so the dirt doesnt come out and stick your plants in with a little fertilizer.)
Would you not end up with anarobic soil like this?

(Make sure you have some fish in that pond or you'll be loaded with Mosquitos.)
Got some goldies in there.

(You might also have a problem with all those pretty rocks on the shelf . It looks nice now but a lot of dirt will get stuck around them making it hard to clean . Also as soon as your algae starts growing , they will be covered and if you have Koi , when they get big they'll knock those to the bottom. Rick)
No to Koi, plan on goldies and blue gills. I plan on squirting those rocks when I add water, kind of flushing them out. I plan on using most of them to anchor plants and hide pots.

I am going to do an experiment. I have 3 irises:
#1 I'll repot soilless now
#2 repot in the spring soilless and
#3 I'll leave in it's pot with soil.

we shall see how they do by summer next year.

RexAnne

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.17.2008 at 07:48 pm    last updated on: 07.17.2008 at 07:48 pm

RE: Non-aquatic plants in pond? (Follow-Up #5)

posted by: drh1 on 05.16.2009 at 04:46 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Impatiens work fine. You may want to use something to support them but they can be planted soil-free on top of your biofilter or in the 1-3 inch deep water. One thing that I find helps with any of my plants in the pond is to dump in about 1 tablespoon (pond size is about 2500 - 3000 gallons) of "Stump remover" near the pump intake. This is really nothing more than adding potassium nitrate and hence no phosphorous. You can also add a similar amount of "liquid iron" to help green up your plants ... but only about every other week or so. Make sure the iron is in the "chelated form" not as iron sulfate or ferric chloride.
---David

NOTES:

stump remover as fert for pond plants...
clipped on: 05.17.2009 at 11:26 am    last updated on: 05.17.2009 at 11:27 am

RE: Parasite Proplem in pond (Follow-Up #16)

posted by: sleeplessinftwayne on 07.14.2007 at 05:15 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Fish are deathly sensitive to bleach. If you use Clorox to clean off the plants any residue could kill your fish. That is why they sell chemicals to offset any chlorine that might be in treated water from the tap. It could also burn the roots of your plants by destroying the layer that contains the part that absorbs moisture and nutrients. While some terrestrial plants can be washed in a weak solution of water and bleach it is only to kill some types of bacteria and fungus but it isn't very effective. The correct solution is one part bleach to ten parts water. It would be safer to use Hydrogen Peroxide. The worm you saw die after a minute in undiluted bleach died from a chemical burn.
I have often considered putting a new package of fish food in the microwave before using it. That should kill any eggs in the food. Ditto the minute crustaceans that contaminated my aquariums.
A couple of years ago I couldn't find the food I usually bought and the pet store owner told me they had to reformulate it because some of the ingredients came from fish that were fed on beef and the producers were concerned that there could be a connection with Jacob-Crutchfield disease, or as we know it, Mad Cow disease. (I know I spelled the J-C wrong but I'm not going to Google it right now and its not in my spell check.)
I am going through a parasite problem in my pond right now and I read that most fish have parasites when you get them. Parasites can also be carried in by birds and animals that get wet in waterways. Products that are reccomended for parasite control are Praziquantel, Anchors Away and Dimlin.
Sandy

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.20.2008 at 02:12 am    last updated on: 07.20.2008 at 02:12 am

RE: Parasite Proplem in pond (Follow-Up #21)

posted by: sleeplessinftwayne on 07.16.2007 at 06:33 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Clorox is not for killing bugs. It burns away organic matter and bacteria. I went back to the beginning to see if you mentioned the size of your pond and the only number I saw was 55 gallons which would be very small for a pond but nice for an aquarium. Is this correct? You could get a parasite control for this size at any good pet store without worry about all those chemical names. I am pretty sure what you have is the same thing my aquariums get when I feed the fishies too much. They live in the mulm but they go on the move sometimes when they feel crowded or disturbed and cling to the roots of plants. They do not consume the plants but in large numbers they and other smaller critters do look like a cloud when the plant is disturbed. Most of the "cloud" is dead plant material and poop(organic matter)that forms a nutrient soup the plant feeds on. If there is no soup your plant will die of starvation. Try Mosquito Dunks which won't harm fish or plants but will kill mosquito larva and other types of larva as well. That should be in any Big Box store in the garden center. That is a Bacillius Thurengenensis (or BT) which is close to what Scott was recommending but you don't have to worry about how much to use. In addition use Jungle Parasite Clear or some similar product under a different brand name. Those treat the water and only incidentally would treat the fish.
BTW, maybe you are not educated about some things but anyone who can understand symptoms of "Huntington's Chorea" is not stupid. Sandy

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.20.2008 at 02:12 am    last updated on: 07.20.2008 at 02:12 am

RE: Pics of my floating planters and some pond pics (Follow-Up #9)

posted by: arvilla on 06.10.2008 at 08:16 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

This is such a wonderful idea! I took this idea and modified it to my needs for a non-functioning fountain where I work. Here is what I did.

I purchased 1/2 inch water pipe (barely over $1 at Home Depot), 90 degree elbows, noodles, fishing line and plastic cross stitch canvas.

I placed the canvas on a flat surface, placing elbows at the corners. The distance between the elbows is the length I cut my noodles.

I then cut my pipe sections 1 inch longer to allow 1/2 inch on each side for the space the elbows would take up.

I slid the noodles onto the pipe, then stitched/tied the noodles to the plastic canvas with fishing line and even ran a line through the bottom so they could be anchored in place.

I then placed a thin layer of spanish moss in the bottom, placed my plants, then snugged them in with more spanish moss. How lovely they looked. I would guess that the cost was $3 each or less. I could never have afforded those expensive ones they offer on line.

I am now thinking about making a larger one - using a full noodle on each side and half noodles for the ends.

Thanks again for sharing your pictures and Lisa's instructions.

NOTES:

floating planter
clipped on: 04.26.2009 at 10:14 pm    last updated on: 04.26.2009 at 10:17 pm

RE: Polishing Water [Long] (Follow-Up #2)

posted by: drh1 on 05.22.2009 at 08:59 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

I apologize for the length of this post but the topic/thread is one that raise numerous points. Please realize that we could discuss this in much greater detail - translation: even more words from this yacky, old guy!!! :-)) But I hope this helps. I’m sure others will want to add their viewpoints as well.

"Polished water" has a variety of meanings but in general it means water that has had additional treatment typically to remove things that are difficult to remove. The term can be applied to waste-waters and also be applied to drinking water or even your pond water after it has been treated in some fashion by "simpler" methods. Such things as removal of trace organics, trace nutrients (phosphorous, nitrates, etc.), heavy metals, bacterial counts, turbidity are all things that would be "reduced" in a polished water. But using car wax does not make it polished water!!! (sorry for the pun!). There are many methods of achieving this but they tend not to work that well for pond systems because of the nature of the pond environment to adapt to whatever is happening. For example, a flocculent aid (these can be - but not limited to - very long-chain polymers that are added to the water and attach to particles causing them to clump together) may show very good performance for a week or two but lose it’s effectiveness over time; the pond may have adapted to it and probably has the bacteria available to consume the polymer or other factors. Using zeolites - usually for ion-exchange or removal of inorganic ions - may work for awhile until the exchange capacity is used up or the surface is covered with bacteria so that exchange can’t take place. Using activated carbon - NOT to be confused with crushing up a charcoal briquets!!! - provides very small pores and huge internal surfaces for sorption of trace organics; it might help with removing your tannins but the A.C. also loses it’s effectiveness as the pores become saturated or covered with bacteria. Find the source of your tannins is probably a better approach.

Oxygen transport and use in your pond. First, you need to understand that ANY type of bacteria that you can reasonably think of exists in your pond; it’s there...count on it. Whether or not it’s there in abundance or is the dominant type depends on the set of conditions that it likes or doesn’t like. There’s no such thing as a pond that is totally free of anaerobic bacteria, free of pathogens, etc. You may be lucky and not have a specific pathogen present at some point in time but I usually assume that something will ultimately happen to help introduce it into my pond (those @#$@$ birds!). If you were to attempt to measure "them" - any specific microbial entity or pathogen, etc. - you might not find many of "them" there but count on "them" being there. When the correct conditions arise "they" will out-compete the other bacteria or other micro-organisms and grow exponentially until the conditions are no longer as favorable for continued growth. This could be the result of temperature, nutrients, lack of microbial predators...a host of things. The second point is that anaerobic conditions are very easy to establish. If you have a submerged pot in you pond with say a lily growing in it then you will have anaerobic conditions within that pond specifically within the container. Even if the surrounding water is highly saturated with oxygen the soil will be anaerobic or near anaerobic within as little as 1/4 inch from the soil-water interface. This depends on a number of factors including the organic content in that soil. There will be oxygen in and around the roots of the plant since it will transport oxygen deep into the pot but it will still "stink" if you lift the pot out and dig around in it. If you choose to look into this more then search using terminology such as "pore water chemistry" when you look. The third point is that all bacteria and algae respire or use oxygen and the rate at which they will use it is very temperature dependent. Algae will have a net production of oxygen during the day with sunlight but during the night or while slipping through you biofilter it will be consuming oxygen. The fourth point is that many - but certainly not all! - bacteria tend to grow better when attached to surfaces. So in that sense the liner of your pond is part of your biofilter; the inside of you pipe from the skimmer to the waterfall is part of your biofilter; etc. Bacteria attach and grow. When you turn off the flow through the line they continue to consume oxygen until it is so reduced or depleted that their growth environment is no longer adequate. Remember, any bacteria you can imagine are already there. So as the oxygen level in your pipe drops down to zero other bacteria - anaerobic (and facultative anaerobes) take over with the result that the original bacterial coating sluffs off the surface and compounds such as sulfates are now reduced to hydrogen sulfide as well as the formation of other anaerobic by-products (the "stench" you complained about). The same thing will occur in your bio-filter if you decided to save a bit of electricity and shut it down for the night. Usually the biofilter will stay aerobic only for an hour or so if the water temperatures are in the 60's; it’s on the order of 10 - 15 minutes if the water is in the 90's or higher! As pointed out by Squirelette even debris captured in a fold in you liner can lead to similar conditions be it for release of tannins or creating of a micro-anaerobic environment. When you then turn on the pump or move water through the line all the sluffed bacteria appear as a batch of turbidity and may or may not stink depending on how long the line was allowed to sit there and accumulate the anaerobic degradation products.

You are mostly correct about where oxygen enters your pond. But there is a bit more to it then that. Oxygen will go into the water wherever air is in touch with the water. The rate at which it will do that is higher the more turbulence you provide (which is why your stream and waterfall help a great deal). But it will also be released into your pond by the algae during the day. It will enter the water over in that quiet little corner away from all the obvious water movement. Once the oxygen is in the water it is carried/moved throughout the water simply by the general turbulence/water movement in the water (sometime add a drop of dye or two and watch how fast it is dispersed in your pond). While diffusion (on the molecular scale) will occur it is a very slow process relative to the mixing that is almost constantly taking place in your pond and is not as much a factor as you might imagine. You may not see the same amount of turbulence throughout your pond but there is some still present. The underlying currents are the result of wind action across the surface, water currents induced by your waterfalls ... and even the occasional eddy from a fish fin! But it is definitely present throughout your pond. Adding an aeration stone at some point will significantly increase the mixing and may help with adding oxygen (although it won’t if you’re already saturated or with 95% or so of saturation).

Finally, the growth of algae on surfaces right after going through your biofilter. Your biofilter is nothing more than a place that provides a lot of surface area for a variety of types of bacteria to attach and grow. While we tend to think of them as being just "nitrifiers" it is actually a complex mix of micro-organisms including but not limited to nitrifiers. Other "critters" are there feeding on critters feeding on bacteria, etc. But the net result is that ammonia and dissolved organic carbon compounds are, for the most part, broken down to carbon dioxide and nitrates (this also has interesting impacts on chloramines but I’ll not get started on that topic here). Phosphorous probably is not removed to any significant extent within your biofilter. So now look at the "growth environment" of the water coming out of the biofilter: it will have some oxygen in it (not all of it was used up), it will have phosphorous in it, it will have carbon dioxide in it, it will have nitrates in it. What or who would LOVE that water??? Algae!!!! Yes, if you put plants in there they will take up some of the nutrients but their removal capabilities will not be 100%. Plus the fact that the moving water transports large quantities of the nutrients past the attached algae further promoting their growth. If you had roaring, raging, class 5 rapids, torrents, etc. cascading over the rocks you wouldn’t see the string algae because the water would abrade it off before they could grow significantly. But in a nutrient-rich environment the algae are sitting there just thanking you for serving their dinner without them even having to order out!!
---David

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 05.23.2009 at 11:23 am    last updated on: 05.23.2009 at 11:23 am

RE: Pond plant hanger (Follow-Up #1)

posted by: sheepco on 01.01.2008 at 09:17 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Well...being basically cheap... I have used the legs of old (or new!, 'cause I hate them) pantyhose, they last for years. Drill 2 holes in a plastic pot at 1 o'clock and 4, thread the pantyhose leg thru and then tie the ends around a rock. A mesh pot, just thread the leg thru anywhere. Wedge stones or whatever under the pot/basket on your uneven shelf to get it level, then tighten up the knot so they stay where you want them. I've read you can just plant the plants in the panthose too.

I use hanging plant extension hooks to hang plant on the sides of my stock tank ponds...same deal, drill 2 holes in the pot and then use 2 hooks.

The only time I have trouble is if I plant a tall plant in a narrow pot...the wind will tip 'em over. So I use really wide containers for those and even they can sit on my unlevel shelves.

You can also put a plastic or wood shelf from the shelf on one side of the pond to the other (weight it down with a rock on each end) and have a level place for pots.

Personally, I'll never do another dug-in-the-side plant shelf.

Happy New Year! S

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.17.2008 at 07:22 pm    last updated on: 07.17.2008 at 07:23 pm

RE: Pond plant hanger (Follow-Up #7)

posted by: goodkarma_ on 01.08.2008 at 06:01 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

I take the aquatic planters and suspend them by tying 2 or three places with fishing line and tying these to plants, or statuary around the pond.

I also take styrofoam(sp?) wreath circles from the craft store and place those aquatic baskets in them - kind of crammed in and grow bog plants in them too. I don't use soil in anything- just tie the roots down with velcro ties from the garden center.

My plants never get steller- but they do ok.

Lisa

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.17.2008 at 07:23 pm    last updated on: 07.17.2008 at 07:24 pm

Potting bench from recycled bits

posted by: imrainey on 07.20.2008 at 01:52 pm in Garden Junk Forum

This is the potting bench my GC made me from a recycled kitchen sink:
P1000935

The sink came out of the kitchen he was remodeling for me. He gave me the aluminum frame from a workbench he was replacing. The tiles were all leftover from various projects -- I've had the field tiles for more than 10 years and even moved them from our old house. Can't let go of anything, I'm afraid! The faucet was supposed to go in our laundry room but it wobbles at the base because of a manufacturing defect so Ikea shipped me a replacement and said to keep the one they couldn't sell. Even the plywood under the tile was a used piece.

The bottom shelf is rescued shelving. The short pieces could rest on the cross braces of the frame. I had to buy a length of shelving for the upper that had to be self-supporting. We also had to buy the plumbing -- piping, connectors and the drains for the sinks. Then I added an undershelf basket (that I had to screw permanently into the plywood) for my handtools.

It's connected to running cold water. There's a short length of recycled garden hose that directs the water from the drains to my near-by tomato bed.

A useful tribute to the concept of recycling! I'm so thrilled with it!

NOTES:

how fun!
clipped on: 07.21.2008 at 10:29 pm    last updated on: 07.21.2008 at 10:30 pm

RE: question about pots... (Follow-Up #9)

posted by: mckool on 05.03.2009 at 10:01 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Love the oil pans for potting: I drillholes and wrap and secue hot water pipe foam insulaton tubes arond the cirfumference of the pan via wire ties and make them as floattng planters filled with batting and some pea gravel for planting - I also leave abotu a 6-8" center section of the botton with No holes so if the planter gets abit heavy I can hot glue a plstic left-over food continer to the bottom to increse the bouancy.

Impatines grow really well, some other land annuals will also - the Marigolds were fine until the Koi pulled them out of the pans.

Secet - keep the crowns of the annual above the water line
and many wil do fine - I think one problem is that in too much sun these pans may get too hot for the plants for the plants.

In Atlanta, GA area I've found my impatiens go absolutely wild afer the hot summ heat breaks around Septembr until the cold weather sets in.

Island plant stand - Ihave taken black plastic pipe, ABS, typically usd in pluming drains(got mine at Lowes), make a table base, filled the legs with sand to hepl reduce the bouancy and used a large flat rock on top - then you can have it so you can plant water pants and also land plants in pots as well.

Note - I glue the pipe and fittings, let the glue dry thoroughly - leave overnight and you'll be fine.

I am sporadic about visintg this forum, so I may not see any responses in a timely

FORGOT - I normally use the 1" pipe insulators and you can use 1-3 rows under each other - just be sure not to hav the ends of the tube meet at the same place on the pan or you can get a lisp in that portion of the pan. even with a single insulator, unless the ends are sealed from water you may get a slight lisp - may be albe to counteract with some pea gravel at the opposite point from the lisp.

I hve a duck weed now about 16-18" tall and it has almost completely fill the oil pan- i give it a few jabcob plsnt spikes and its been a happy camper - what is nice is that impatiens can be planted around the edges - this year I'm trying 4 dragon tails in the centr of pan and will have impatiens, some other plants around the edges

Enough typing on a laptop - Shalom

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 05.03.2009 at 12:24 pm    last updated on: 05.03.2009 at 12:25 pm

Results of parasite treatment and other stuff

posted by: sleeplessinftwayne on 07.25.2007 at 06:19 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

I thought some of you might be interested in the results of treating my pond for the parasites that I could see and the ones that I suspected were distressing my pond fishies. I haven't been able to get down to pond level recently but I could see there was something wrong and began taking notes to see if I could figure it out. Two of the three oldest comets have lost a lot of their color and one of the others looks burnished. One was producing a lot of the slime coat we read about and they would pause while their gills appeared to work overtime. Several younger fish had lost one or two scales in small spots leaving a white spot behind. This was not the typical ick appearance. I suppose there must be some fungus active but I can't see any of that. One of the fancy comets with huge butterfly fins had a funny transparent swirl on it's tail that over a long period changed position. Aha! A fish louse. Yuck! There was a bumpy texture to the under surface of the skin of some of the fish that seemed to fit the descriptions of several common parasites but without doing an autopsy there was no way to be certain which one. Then one of the larger koi began to hide in the corner. Within 2 days she was in serious stress and died without any outer evidence except the slime coat to show why. I was just sick. She was a truly lovely fish.
I read volumes about fish diseases and requested info from ponders on this forum and while I couldn't locate all the sources I finally settled on Praziquantrel and Anchors Away as a combination that would work on most of the common parasites and a few of the more uncommon ones. After measuring the pond repeatedly to make sure I was giving the correct dosage I set about mixing and dosing the pond. I hit a snag when I found the Prazi doesn't just disolve in water and had to go looking for Malachite Green and formaldehyde. I read labels on dozens for products in three stores before I found the right stuff. Really annoying but at least I did find it. I would tell you what the name of the product is but I read the labels on three sizes of the same product only to find that none of them was the same as the others. It was also annoying but not surprising that none of the store clerks knew what I was talking about and only one had the honesty to admit it.
The stuff was finally ready to go into the water. I poured a cupful at a time into the "blowhole" in the pipe going into the bottom of the Skippy. When I designed that pipe I was thinking about preventing a backwash during a power failure but this was the perfect way to make sure the half a bucketful of medicine was well mixed with water when it entered the pond. After the first day I observed with some trepidation that there was not a lot of visible affect but I did see what appeared to be several dead worm like critters caught in the Parrot's Feather. One fish shook it's head several times but there didn't seem to be any other effect. The next day it seemed that the fish that previously had their gills open all the time were now closing them easily. The excess slime coat was much less and the lumpy skin was smoothing out. The louse was gone. Hooray! There were several other minor observations that probably meant nothing. Today all the fishies are appearing to be in better health generally and I am happy to report there have been no deaths in the pond population except for the parasites and those nasty annoying black snails. Just in case there are some eggs that escaped I am going to change out the quilt batting filter material. I am sorry I waited so long. Maybe I would not have lost that koi.
Some of you might be interested in some of the other critters that live in the pond and in and on the fishies. I often recommend this site simply because it is so amazing. I don't know how old the young man is who put it together but I hope he knows just how marvelous his site is. Sandy

Here is a link that might be useful: The world in miniature

NOTES:

prazi & anchors away
clipped on: 07.11.2009 at 04:02 pm    last updated on: 07.11.2009 at 04:03 pm

RE: Rows of Sharon - Transplanted (Follow-Up #1)

posted by: brandon7 on 04.14.2009 at 09:03 am in Shrubs Forum

The common name for Hibiscus syriacus is Rose of Sharon.

The shrubs would be MUCH better off if you stopped fertilizing them!

You don't mention how much of the rootball your shrubs had left. Here is a general guideline that will give you some idea of what they should have had:

For trunk diameter below 1/2", multiply the diameter by 20 to get approximate rootball diameter.
For trunk diameter between 1/2" and 1", multiply the diameter by 18 to get approximate rootball diameter.
For trunk diameter between 1" and 1-1/2", multiply the diameter by 16 to get approximate rootball diameter.
For trunk diameter between 1-1/2" and 2-1/2", multiply the diameter by 14 to get approximate rootball diameter.
For trunk diameter between 2-1/2" and 4", multiply the diameter by 12 to get approximate rootball diameter.

Here are guidelines for rootball depth:

For a rootball with a diameter of 1', depth should be approximately 8".
For a rootball with a diameter of 2', depth should be approximately 1'.
For a rootball with a diameter of 3', depth should be approximately 15".
For a rootball with a diameter of 4', depth should be approximately 18".

My Hibiscus syriacus's have not leafed out at all yet, and I'm two zones warmer than you! You planted them at a very good time of year, so now all you can do is watch and see. Just be sure to provide the proper amount of water (you'll need to check the soil and rootball) this growing season. Remember that slow, deep watering, when the soil starts to dry out, is much better than frequent, shallow, quick watering.

Here is a link that might be useful: Generic Rootball Size Guide

NOTES:

Rootball size and depth guides lines
clipped on: 04.28.2009 at 01:54 pm    last updated on: 04.28.2009 at 01:55 pm

RE: sick lethargic goldfish (Follow-Up #5)

posted by: ccoombs1 on 07.15.2008 at 10:32 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

OK, so your water is probably not the issue.....the new fish probably are.

The tetra product you used is a little "iffy". The active ingrediant is Quinine-hydrochloride, which is dangerous and not quite as effective against many parasite. Not knowing what the parasite is creates another problem. there is not one single parasite treatment that gets them all. Dimilin takes care of the larger parasites (fish lice and anchor worms but I don't think this is what you are dealing with). Prazi or fluke tabs takes care of skin and gill flukes, and A formalin/malachite green product such as ProformC will take care of the rest of them such as ich and costia.

So here's my suggestion. First...get an aerator in there to help them breath. Do some water changes to get the salt levels down to less than .1% since many parasite treatments are not compatible with salt, and treat them with Prazi or fluke tabs for flukes and proformC or a similar malachite green/formalin product for the rest of the parasites. They will need to be treated for a total of 10 days because the life cycle of ich must be considered and there is only a tiny window of time during their life cycle that they can be killed. Follow the dosing on the bottle and even if the bottle says one dose is all that's required, do multiple doses anyway. Retreating with ProformC every 3 days with a 25% water change before each new treatment will be fine.

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.20.2008 at 01:16 am    last updated on: 07.20.2008 at 01:16 am

RE: Spill Stone -- Best Edge? (Follow-Up #4)

posted by: mike_il on 07.07.2009 at 02:30 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

jellobiafra,

There are few different factors that will affect how the water will come off the stone. First is the flow rate over that stone. As an example if the stone is 12" wide and you have about 2400 gph going over it you will end up with a sheet of water that is a 1/2" thick and will come off as a solid sheet. If you change that flow to about 300 gph and the water will be about 1/16" thick and will want to rap around the front of the stone. Any time the sheet thickness drops below a 1/4" it will have a tendency to rap around the front of the stone. This is all assuming the stone is level front to back. The more the stone is lower on the front end the easier the water will have it as far as going off the front of the stone. Also this assumes that the stone is flat the more rough or rounded the more the water will want to rap around so a greater flow is required to overcome this effect. Also the wider the stone is the thicker the sheet has to be to come off as a solid sheet. The width of the stone doesn't usually become a factor until the width gets wider then 4 ft. As an example a rock that is 2 ft wide with 2400 gph going over it will come off the rock as a solid sheet but increase the width of the stone to 5 ft with 6000 gph going over it the sheet will want to break up some. Increase the width to 8 ft with a flow of 9600 gph and the sheet will break up into two or three sheets. The widest falls that I have ever made was 16 ft or 192 inches wide. At 19,200 gph the sheet came off the stone as five separate sheets or falls. It took 30,000 gph to get the water to form one sheet.
Mike

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.10.2009 at 08:04 am    last updated on: 07.10.2009 at 08:04 am

RE: Still talking about a waterfall............ (Follow-Up #6)

posted by: johnkr on 04.03.2009 at 02:58 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

Anna, run a line of aquarium glue along the side edges of the plexiglass. It will help keep the water flowing forward and not over the sides. Another line of glue on the bottom side of the glass will keep the water from rolling underneath the falls. The under side line of glue should be about an inch from the edge. I also used aquarium glue to attach the plexiglass to a piece of flagstone.

Catherine, the fall is currently under re-construction. I'm increasing the height by a few inches.

NOTES:

this may be an idea to keep the water from rolling under the sides of the stone in the fall,wonder if black foam will work...
clipped on: 04.03.2009 at 03:18 pm    last updated on: 04.03.2009 at 03:21 pm

RE: Tall + woodchuck/deer resistant (Follow-Up #14)

posted by: giboosi_alttara on 08.06.2007 at 11:11 am in Perennials Forum

I (heart) my Heptacodium, and actually am rooting more because I want to plant them all along the drive. They have everything but fall color, which I will provide by planting Rhus typhina 'Tiger Eyes' in front of them.

Oh, but this is not the shrubs forum! Sorry. I got carried away.

Verbascum is a self-seeder, so I've heard. I've not tried it yet myself.

NOTES:

She's propagating her seven sons tree!!
clipped on: 05.27.2009 at 01:07 pm    last updated on: 05.27.2009 at 01:07 pm

Two different applications here. (Follow-Up #22)

posted by: larryl on 02.29.2008 at 12:54 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

I want to make a distinction that may be a little fuzzy here. Fertilizing plants that are potted in clay is a little different than fertilizers for plants that are floating or maybe planted in gravel.

If a plant is planted in clay soil, like lilies usually are, they can be given a complete fertilizer that contains everything including phosphate. The fertilizer is available to the plant but doesn't leach into the water because the clay contains it. Lilies like lots of phosphate to bloom well, but the phosphate would promote algae if it got into the water column.

Fertilizing floating or gravel planted plants requires some care. They can be fertilized by adding the fertilizers directly to the water. If you put it in the gravel it is going to end up in the water anyway. Adding potash, nitrate, and micronutrients to the water is fine, but adding phosphate to the water is asking for algae trouble. The problem is plants like lilies really need the phosphate.

I think your lilies will do better if you put them in clay and give them lots of complete fertilizer. You can also add nitrate, potash, and micronutrients to the water to feed the floating and submerged plants. They will scavenge enough phosphates from the fish waste products to grow well. This will give you healthy plants AND clear water.

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.21.2008 at 09:08 pm    last updated on: 07.21.2008 at 09:08 pm

RE: Which air pump to buy???? (Follow-Up #4)

posted by: zinniachick on 10.05.2007 at 08:10 am in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

I use a $10 aquarium air pump, in a Tupperware box with a hole cut in the bottom for the cord and tubes to come out. It is wedged into a metal lawn chair to keep it up out of the wet and keep it from being pulled into the pond. It does a great job keeping a hole in the ice all winter.

That's all it does, though. If you're looking for something to oxygenate your entire pond or stir up the bottom or something, this won't cut it. But for my 12,000 gallon former swimming pool, this keeps the fish alive all winter by allowing gas exchange between the pond water and surrounding air.

Be sure the air pump is same temp as outside, not inside a heated shed or container. If it pumps warmer air through its tubes which are out in the freezing cold, condensation will occur inside the tubes and then freeze and block them.

NOTES:

more ideas in post
clipped on: 07.20.2008 at 12:50 am    last updated on: 07.20.2008 at 12:53 am

RE: Which fertilizer and application method? (Follow-Up #15)

posted by: kalevi on 02.26.2008 at 04:22 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

The stuff is called "Flourish iron" by a company called Seachem. It is a 1% soluble iron liquid. I use about 1/4 a bottle in May, an other 1/4 in June, and 1/4 in July. The last goes in the next May. I just spray it in after using a syringe to measure it out.

They say add 1 capful (5ml) for each 50 gallons or in my case, 22 capfuls = 110 ml for 1100 gallons. Bottle is 500ml and so lasts for about 4+ doses. I'm pretty heavily planted and this seems enough as my plants grow like crazy.

I know there was a post here about 2 years ago about some powder fertilizer additive that contains iron that is probably cheaper than what I have if you have a large (many 1000s of gallons).

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.21.2008 at 09:05 pm    last updated on: 07.21.2008 at 09:06 pm

RE: Which fertilizer and application method? (Follow-Up #16)

posted by: larryl on 02.27.2008 at 03:24 pm in Ponds & Aquatic Plants Forum

I use Fertilome Liquid Iron. This isn't intended for pond use, but I have been using it for five or six years with good results. It contains 3.55%iron, .16% zinc, .15% manganese, and .05% copper. It doesn't contain boron or molybdenum, so I also add some Lily Miller IronSafe every so often. The IronSafe isn't intended for pond use either. I used to use Ironite but somebody convinced me that it contains lead and shouldn't be used in ponds.

Both the Liquid Iron and IronSafe are inexpensive and easy to use. Both seem to solve those mysterious chlorotic plant symptoms. Everyone that has floating plants will eventually encounter chlorosis. Adding one of these iron containing supplements usually clears it up in a couple of days.

NOTES:

<none>
clipped on: 07.21.2008 at 09:06 pm    last updated on: 07.21.2008 at 09:06 pm

 
 

iVillage GardenWeb: The Internet's Garden & Home Community  
  iVillage Home & Garden Network