![]() |
|
Clippings by rina_ |
||
| Sort by: Last Updated Post Date Post Title Forum Name | ||
|
RE: Fertilizering Containerized Plants IV (Follow-Up #36)
posted by: tapla on 08.14.2012 at 06:37 pm in Container Gardening Forum There is little variation in the nutritional content of the various organs of any given plant. While you're told that N is for foliage, P is for roots, ..... - the fact is, the plant needs all the essential elements in roughly the same ratio for all it's parts. If you would like to curtail vegetative growth and promote the plant's allocating more energy to fruit production, simply reduce the N you're supplying. I do this by reducing the frequency of my applications of fertilizer and/or the strength of the solution, and by adding either KCl (potash) or Pro-TeKt 0-0-3 to the fertilizer solution. In essence, it changes my fertilizer ratio to something close to 3:1:3. It's important to understand that you have to ACTUALLY TAKE CONTROL of the N you're supplying and make sure you're creating a N deficiency to accomplish this goal. It's not the fertilizer ratio that controls how much N is delivered, it's the grower's hand on the watering can that contains the solution. Just changing the ratio to 3:1:3 won't do it if you continue to supply all the N the plant wants. The extra K is just ensuring there won't be a K deficiency if you are in control enough to keep the foliage a lighter shade of green, indicating your strategy is probably working. You'll probably be sacrificing some older and interior foliage as a result of your reduction in the amount of N you're supplying if it's working as you planned.
Al NOTES: <none>
clipped on: 08.14.2012 at 09:26 pm last updated on: 08.14.2012 at 09:26 pm
|
||
|
RE: 5:1:1 Cost (Follow-Up #16)
posted by: tapla on 08.07.2012 at 06:17 pm in Container Gardening Forum
NOTES: <none>
clipped on: 08.07.2012 at 07:49 pm last updated on: 08.07.2012 at 07:49 pm
|
||
