![]() |
|
Clippings by ae2ga |
||
| Sort by: Last Updated Post Date Post Title Forum Name | ||
|
RE: can lights and energy efficiency (Follow-Up #6)
posted by: live_wire_oak on 01.26.2013 at 10:43 am in Kitchens Forum ICAT + LED No air leaks and no real heat in the living space either. MUCH lower energy bills. Win/win.
NOTES: <none>
clipped on: 01.27.2013 at 03:44 am last updated on: 01.27.2013 at 03:44 am
|
||
|
RE: can lights and energy efficiency (Follow-Up #11)
posted by: rococogurl on 01.26.2013 at 04:32 pm in Kitchens Forum The PAR 38 LEDS from Lowe's (private label is Illumitech made by Feit for them) have Edison bases. They fit my 8 y.o. Lightolier cans. Each can brand/type has bulbs they accept -- my cans have a sticker inside with that info but lighting specs for the cans should show that.
Thing with the LEDs I've been using is that they must be compatible with my dimmer switches so I've been focused on that. Lutron's site has the compatible bulb list in their switch specs. LEDs are very cool compared to incandescent. So there is much much less heat. What they did in my house was go into the attic and air seal with soy foam around every can from above. The foam dries rigid and nothing gets through. They foamed around around every electrical chase, the hvac vents -- everything. It took 3 guys two days. Then they cut this 2-inch thick foil-lined foam board to fit around the attic perimeter, installed the proper vents, foamed the joints and then taped the foam board over the entire attic floor. They closed in the sides of the access stairs and made a hatch door -- it looks like a space station up there. Would think it's ideal for insulation to go in before the cans and then have them sealed down properly. Retro work is much harder. They also sealed up every cranny in my basement around the rim joist which also was leaking like crazy, around windows and even under the metal fireplace floor guard. An insulation contractor who is certified and knows what he is doing is a blessing. I was very dubious before. DH didn't even want to bother with it. But once they go through your house with the infrared camera and show you where everything is leaking -- then walk through with you again after the job is done -- and no more blue spots, you can see. They sealed up spots in my garage as well. I'm a complete convert after these 5 days of 0 to 10 weather. Proof is the stable temperature in the house; lower heating and electrical costs. I don't know about cathedral ceilings -- expect that would depend on the roof construction. If you went for an energy audit (they are free under a certain income level with modest surcharges above in our state) they could tell you what you need to do and give you an estimate. NOTES: <none>
clipped on: 01.27.2013 at 03:43 am last updated on: 01.27.2013 at 03:43 am
|
||
|
RE: can lights and energy efficiency (Follow-Up #13)
posted by: rococogurl on 01.26.2013 at 07:25 pm in Kitchens Forum We have central air. I am told the insulation with work the same way for that -- you are correct (but I haven't been through a cooling season as yet so I don't know if it will be as efficient).
I'm an ID and do my own lighting plans. I like 5" cans as they offer a good light spread and you don't need rows and rows of them. Some designers prefer smaller cans and pin spots. My preference is even overall light that can be controlled via dimmers. When done properly, you see light, not the cans. Aesthetically I'm not mad for multiple hanging or surface mounted fixtures. I had to use mini tracks in our apartment which worked well -- a great solution for some ceilings. Because the technology is changing so rapidly I feel a great lighting designer or ID with this expertise is worth the fee and I say that as a diehard DIY GWebber who taught herself to put in a drip watering system outside and saved $8K. OTOH, if you want a challenge, have time and don't mind living with your own mistakes, it can be mastered. But it's really technical. I made a mistake when we did our apartment -- fortunately I had a genius electrician But before I hired anyone I would read through the Lutron site and see what they offer. I drool every time. Would love a control panel on each floor -- those weren't well developed when we did our reno. I'm also into specialty switches with LEDs down the side so there's no groping in the dark. I installed one with infrared and a little remote control for the main lights in our bedroom - just great, and I will use it again when we change out the ones here. In some states, electric companies will give you incentives or rebates on the cost of switches that are on timers and turn themselves off -- another aspect to explore. Here's a link to EFS, the financing entity that works with states across the country. You may not need the services but they are the mother ship for programs available in various states and the list of green-certified contractors who work with them regularly. That's how I find ours. If you need more background on the deal or have questions about the audit or whatever, best to email. Here is a link that might be useful: EFS NOTES: <none>
clipped on: 01.27.2013 at 03:42 am last updated on: 01.27.2013 at 03:42 am
|
||
|
RE: Shelf depth/height for non walkin pantry (Follow-Up #2)
posted by: buehl on 01.12.2013 at 07:54 pm in Kitchens Forum Just keep in mind that you will need to reach over the deeper shelves to get to the shallower shelves above. 12" vs 9" shouldn't be an issue, but too much deeper on the bottom shelves could be an issue.
There's a pantry thread on the Gallery - I suggest you check it out. BTW...I so agree with you about the wire vs wood! I had and hated the wire shelves...love my solid shelves now! Here is a link that might be useful: Thread: Pantry photos/ pics of pantries NOTES: good pantry info and pics
clipped on: 01.13.2013 at 08:38 pm last updated on: 01.13.2013 at 08:39 pm
|
||
|
RE: 99% finished. Off White kitchen. So HAPPY!! (Follow-Up #67)
posted by: mamadadapaige on 05.30.2008 at 10:20 pm in Kitchens Forum sammydog, you are right on one count. the light in the hallway is Ikea. I ordered it a few years ago online. When it arrived at the house it was in an 8"x10" manila envelope. I was shocked!! I had to assemble it myself... that's what you get for $40!
The other light fixture is from Visual Comfort . I have their light fixtures all over my house. I love their stuff. I think they are poor man's (but still not very cheap) version of Urban Archaeology which I adore but could never afford. Neena's lighting is a good place to look at Visual Comfort. I ended up ordering from another online company though as the pricing was significantly better, and I had a coupon code. For instance, the light over my table where I purchased it was $238 vs. $379 listed on Neena's, but I thought Neena's was a little easier and has more stuff than the other place. The place I bought from is: http://lightingnewyork.com/store/visual_comfort.html?gclid=CPGt0N7Vz5MCFQOuFQodi2NYjg The stuff arrived very quickly and I was very satisfied with my dealings with them. Here is a link that might be useful: Visual Comfort Lighting NOTES: visual comfort lighting
clipped on: 12.31.2012 at 02:09 pm last updated on: 12.31.2012 at 02:10 pm
|
||
|
RE: Thoughts about mixing arabesque tile colors? (Follow-Up #4)
posted by: colorfast on 12.15.2012 at 02:57 am in Kitchens Forum I have seen these in different colors and it can come out really well. Here's one:
Here is a link that might be useful: Pratt & Larson arabesques NOTES: tiles
clipped on: 12.16.2012 at 04:42 pm last updated on: 12.16.2012 at 04:42 pm
|
||
|
RE: Do U LOVE Your Kitchen Sink Faucet?! (Follow-Up #44)
posted by: xxxOldTimeCarpenter on 11.07.2012 at 02:57 pm in Kitchens Forum To find out actual objective information about bath and kitchen faucets, follow the link.
Here is a link that might be useful: Faucet Reviews and Ratings NOTES: faucet info
clipped on: 12.03.2012 at 02:18 pm last updated on: 12.03.2012 at 02:19 pm
|
||
|
RE: Is Kerdi-Board Overkill for Tub Surround (Follow-Up #5)
posted by: mongoct on 09.29.2012 at 04:17 pm in Bathrooms Forum
NOTES: illustrated instructions - the best kind.
clipped on: 09.29.2012 at 04:32 pm last updated on: 09.29.2012 at 04:33 pm
|
||
|
RE: FAQ/Answers Bathroom Plumbing for dummies (Follow-Up #32)
posted by: mongoct on 02.17.2011 at 04:58 pm in Bathrooms Forum "I have read that PEX is better than copper; galvanized is out; pvc is good/ not allowed/ doesn't matter."
For water supply, copper is still king, though PEX is making inroads. Things may have changed, but as of early last year PEX was not allowed for potable water supply applications in California and Chicago. CA was on the verge of allowing PEX, but I don't know where Chicago is headed. If anywhere. As to one being better than the other, they both have advantages and disadvantages when compared to each other. It depends on the application and the specific trait you're comparing. In my area (CT) PVC is pretty much used just for DWV. Black iron pipe is used for boiler work, plumbing oil tanks, plumbing some gas lines, etc. "Is there one type that is main supply and then another type that connects to the brass-inside-the-wall-parts?" If PEX is used, usually metal (copper and/or black pipe) will be run off the water heater or boiler to a manifold. PEX will run from the manifold to the areas of use. Behind the wall at the area of use (near the toilet, near the sink) the PEX will transition back to copper before coming out of the wall. So you'll have PEX behind the wall and copper sticking out of the wall. PEX is like Dracula, it's not good for it to see the light of day. UV from the sun will oxidize the PEX and cause it to lose it's elasticity. The only PEX failure I've seen was PEX in a basement ceiling run, the PEX ran in front of a small basement window and turned a corner right in front of the window. It eventually suffered a sidewall split in the bend. The PEX on either side of the window was fine, the area in front of the window it was discolored yellow. UV damage. When comparing 1/2" PEX versus 1/2" copper, PEX has a smaller inside diameter. A few people have complained on this forum of trying to fill their bathtubs through a tub spout with a diverter built into the tub spout, and while filling the tub, water was also pouring out of the shower head up above. Those set-ups works on simple gravity flow. With the tub spout being plumbed with PEX instead of copper, the lesser inside diameter of the PEX allowed less water to flow through it, so water was backing up the vertical tubing and flowing out the next exit point, the shower head. "I have also seen on This Old House a type of fitting to connect pipes that has - for lack of a better description - like teeth to connect copper pipes instead of sweating or threading. Is this common? Acceptable for code?" Probably Sharkbite fittings. They may or may not be code acceptable. Years ago they were allowed with restrictions. Today while national code may allow them, some local codes still prevent them. Sometimes they are allowed but not enclosed within framing bays. They're easy, but pricey. For a handyman or DIY repair they might be worth it for the convenience and for not having to fire up a torch in a tight space. But for whole-house, cha-ching! I will say there are three types of PEX; PEX-A, PEX-B, and PEX-C. The difference is how they are cross-linked. I prefer "A", which is cross-linked by the "peroxide" or "Engel" method. You'll find others who use B (silane) or C (electron beam) methods. No big deal. I'm simply an "A" guy. Personal preference. With copper, there are three basic versions of copper tubing used in residential construction, or three versions generally available to the DIY crowd; K, L, and M. "K" has the thickest sidewall, "M" the thinnest. K is usually used for buried applications, L for residential water supply, and M for low-pressure applications like water runs to/from baseboard heating, or water runs from a boiler to a radiant floor heat manifold. Top of my head numbers, the sidewall thickness of K is about 20% thicker than L, and L is about 40% thicker than M. Thickest to thinnest, K is about 75% thicker than M. They all use the same fittings, meaning a simple 1/2" elbow will fit all three types. Flow restriction through any of the tubing is not an issue even with the variations in sidewall thickness. I don't use M for anything, but that's my personal preference. Just K or L. In a box store, you have to be careful if they sell all three. If they sell it, with the thinnest sidewall M will be the least expensive, so it might look attractive to the budget. But it should not be used for domestic water supply lines. NOTES: inside the walls
clipped on: 08.18.2012 at 08:56 pm last updated on: 08.18.2012 at 08:56 pm
|
||
|
RE: FAQ/Answers Bathroom Plumbing for dummies (Follow-Up #29)
posted by: mongoct on 02.15.2011 at 01:26 pm in Bathrooms Forum
NOTES: more on showers
clipped on: 08.18.2012 at 08:51 pm last updated on: 08.18.2012 at 08:52 pm
|
||
|
RE: FAQ/Answers Bathroom Plumbing for dummies (Follow-Up #8)
posted by: mongoct on 06.25.2008 at 09:07 pm in Bathrooms Forum
NOTES: information on shower valves
clipped on: 08.18.2012 at 08:14 pm last updated on: 08.18.2012 at 08:15 pm
|
||

